The Cost of Doing Nothing: Why It’s Time to Replace Outdated Reading Curricula

Every year, your school pours thousands—sometimes millions—into reading materials.

And yet...

  • Reading scores stall

  • Teachers express frustration

  • Struggling readers stay stuck

  • And parents start asking questions

All while your team clings to a curriculum that’s been “good enough” for years.

But what’s the cost of keeping it?

Let’s talk about why it’s time to replace outdated reading programs—and what your school could gain by making the switch. 🏫📚📉

🚨 The Hard Truth About Most Legacy Programs

Programs built on balanced literacy or three cueing systems (looking at pictures, guessing from context) were never backed by research.

Popular names like:

  • Fountas & Pinnell

  • Reading Recovery

  • Leveled Literacy Intervention

Sound familiar?

They may look comprehensive. But they fundamentally ignore how the brain learns to read.

And that’s costing kids years of progress.

📉 The Hidden Costs of Doing Nothing

  1. Long-Term Learning Gaps
    Students move up in grade but stay behind in skill.
    By middle school, the gaps are too wide for most general education interventions to close.

  2. Teacher Burnout
    When teachers see their students struggle year after year, even when doing what their curriculum demands, morale tanks.

  3. Lost Trust from Families
    Parents notice when their child is “on grade level” but can’t read a menu or fluently decode basic words.

  4. Special Ed Overload
    More kids are referred for special education not because they have a disability, but because they’ve never been taught how to read properly.

  5. Money Wasted on More-of-the-Same
    Sticking with “what we’ve always used” leads to more PD, more testing, more supplements—without solving the core problem.

🧠 What the Science of Reading Has Proven

Skilled reading depends on:

  • Phonemic awareness

  • Phonics

  • Sound-symbol mapping

  • Fluency

  • Language comprehension

These elements must be:

  • Explicitly taught

  • Systematically delivered

  • Consistently reinforced

Any program that doesn’t do this is leaving students behind.

✅ What Schools Gain By Switching

🔹 1. Better Outcomes for All Learners

Structured literacy isn’t just for struggling readers.
It lifts high-achievers too—by improving decoding, spelling, and comprehension.

🔹 2. Happier Teachers

When instruction works, teachers feel empowered—not exhausted.

🔹 3. Measurable Growth

Phonics-aligned, decodable-based instruction produces results you can track—and celebrate.

🔹 4. Equity in Action

Keeping a broken curriculum because “some kids are fine” widens the gap.
Switching to a research-based approach ensures every student gets what they need.

📘 How BrainySheets Can Help With the Transition

If your school is just beginning to explore better literacy tools, BrainySheets offers:

  • Decodable reading passages for every stage

  • Short, structured guides anyone can use

  • Easy-to-print resources that work in Tier 1 or intervention settings

It's a low-lift way to start aligning with the Science of Reading—without waiting for a full curriculum overhaul.

Final Thoughts

It’s not easy to replace something familiar.
But it’s harder to keep defending what doesn’t work.

If reading is the foundation of all learning, then investing in the right approach isn’t optional—it’s urgent.

And the longer we wait, the more it costs.

📈 Kids deserve better.
🧑‍🏫 Teachers deserve tools that work.
🏫 Schools deserve results that last.

Previous
Previous

Is It Dyslexia—Or a Phonics Gap?

Next
Next

“I’m Not a Reading Specialist”—But You’re Still Their Best Chance